Amicus Committee
Overview
DRI may participate in litigation as amicus curiae in matters selected in accordance with specific guidelines from the Board of Directors. A committee consisting of seven (7) DRI members appointed by the President administers the program. The Committee arranges for the filing of amicus briefs in noteworthy cases pending before state and federal appellate courts. It reviews petitions for DRI participation from members to determine whether an amicus brief in support of a particular defense position would be appropriate.
The guidelines for DRI participation as amicus curiae specify that the case must present an opportunity for DRI to make meaningful and original arguments that could result in a contribution to jurisprudence. The case must be of special significance to the defense bar or the defense practice and the points raised in any brief must be consistent with the general Mission Statement and Purpose of DRI.
If you are interested in requesting DRI’s participation as amicus curiae, please contact Jay Ludlam, DRI Amicus Committee Staff Liaison, at jludlam@dri.org for more information.
Amicus Briefs
- 2013 Willis of Colorado v Troice [State law securities class actions]
- 2013 Sears v Butler [Consumer Product Class Certification]
- 2013 University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center v Nassar [Employment Law - Retaliation Claims]
- 2013 Oxford Health Plans v Sutter [Arbitration Enforcement]
- 2012 Mutual Pharmaceutical Company v Bartlett [preemption; generic pharmaceuticals]
- 2012 OBoyle v Borough of Longport [Work-product doctrine]
- 2012 American Express Company v Italian Colors Restaurant [Arbitration Enforcement]
- 2012 China Terminal and Electric v Willemsen [Personal Jurisdiction]
- 2012 Goldman Sachs v NECA-IBEW Health and Welfare Fund [Standing to bring class actions]
- 2012 Gabelli v Securities and Exchange Commission [Discovery and Statute of Limitations for Government Penalty Actions]
- 2012 Standard Fire Insurance Company v Knowles [CAFA Removal]
- 2012 Braun v Wal-Mart [Wage and Hour Class Actions]
- 2012 Air Wisconsin Airlines Corp v Hoeper [ATSA Immunity]
- 2012 Stengel v Medtronic [Preemption - Medical Devices]
- 2012 Genesis v Symczyk - merits- [Standing in FLSA Collective Actions]
- 2012 Oxford Health Plans v Sutter [Arbitration Enforcement]
- 2012 American Express v Italian Colors Restaurant [Arbitration Enforcement]
- 2012 Merrill Lynch v McReynolds [“Issue” class certification]
- 2012 Comcast v Behrend [Class certification expert testimony]
- 2012 Willis of Colorado v Troice [State law securities class actions]
Amicus Committee
-
Holland & Knight
Washington, DCPhone: (202) 469-5151
E-Mail: Jerrold.Ganzfried@hklaw.com -
Horvitz & Levy
Encino, CAPhone: (818) 995-0800
E-Mail: daxelrad@horvitzlevy.com -
Bradley Arant Boult Cummings
Huntsville, ALPhone: (256) 517-5198
E-Mail: ssmith@babc.com -
Arnold & Porter
Washington, DCPhone: (202) 942-5842
E-Mail: lisa.blatt@aporter.com -
Briggs and Morgan PA
Minneapolis, MNPhone: (612) 977-8789
E-Mail: dbratvold@briggs.com -
Winston & Strawn
Chicago, ILPhone: (312) 558-8768
E-Mail: lcoberly@winston.com -
McKenna Long & Aldridge
Washington, DCPhone: (202) 496-7727
E-Mail: lebner@mckennalong.com -
Warner Norcross & Judd
Grand Rapids, MIPhone: (616) 752-2539
E-Mail: mnelson@wnj.com -
Hinshaw & Culbertson
Chicago, ILPhone: (312) 704-3243
E-Mail: spuiszis@hinshawlaw.com -
Plunkett Cooney
Bloomfield Hills, MIPhone: (313) 983-4801
E-Mail: mmassaron@plunkettcooney.com -
DRI - Executive Director
Chicago, ILPhone: (312) 795-1101
E-Mail: johnrkouris@dri.org -
DRI - Director of Publications
Chicago, ILPhone: (312) 698-6210
E-Mail: jludlam@dri.org
